NEHA MEGHWAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ARUN MONGA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-07. NEHA MEGHWAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:7846] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3568/2025 Neha Meghwal D/o Amrit Lal Meghwal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Motikhera Bus Stand, Airport Road, Post Gudli, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur (Posted As Level-I At Mahatma Gandhi Government School, Naharmangra, Block Mavli, District Udaipur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Udaipur. 6. The Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Government School, Naharmangra, Block Mavli, District Udaipur. ----Respondents Connected with S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3619/2025 For Petitioner(s) : Mr.
Ramniwas Choudhary For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order (Oral) 07/02/2025 1. Under challenge herein is an order dated 07. 12. 2024 (Annex. 1), vide which the petitioners have been declared surplus and transferred from their present place of posting i. e. Mahatama Gandhi Govt. School, Naharmangra, Block Mavli, District Udaipur to Govt. Primary School, Virwaliya, Block Mavli, District Udaipur [2025:RJ-JD:7846] (2 of 2) [CW-3568/2025] and Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Sakroda, Block Mavli, District Udaipur respectively. 2. Heard. 3. Grievance of the petitioners herein is that they are not against their transfer order, but are not being allowed in the School where they have been directed to takeover charge as Teachers on the ground that there is no such posts available in the said schools. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are sanguine that, in case they are allowed to file individual representations qua the grievance raised in the present writ petitions and the same are taken up on the administrative side, it will receive favorable treatment. Therefore, the competent authority may decide the same as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission, without commenting on merits of the case, the petitions are disposed of. The competent authority of the respondents is directed to either take remedial measures to allow the petitioners to join at the place of transfer or pass corrective orders to give them an alternative posting. 6. Till the needful is done, no adverse action shall be taken against the petitioners and their salary shall be disbursed as they are being kept out of job for no fault of theirs. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 68-DhananjayS/Rmathur/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.