GURDEV SINGH v. P.C. KISHAN AND ORS
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-23. GURDEV SINGH v. P.C. KISHAN AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Writ Contempt No. 982/2016 Gurdev Singh S/o Shri Preetam Singh, R/o 22-Ps, Handa Colony, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Gangangar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. P. c. Kishan, District Collector, Sri Gangangar 2. R. c. Choudhary,chief Engineer, Water Resources-North, Hanumangarh 3. Pradeep Rustagi, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Circle, District-Sri Ganganagar 4. Ram Rakh, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources, Sub Division, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Gangangar 5. Kailash Chandra, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Ganganagar ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Writ Contempt No. 981/2016 Cosmo Cinema Earlier Vishnu Cinema, A Partnership Concern Cinema, Chak 22-Ps, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, R/o- Ward No. 7, House No. 262, Adarsh Colony, Anoopgarh, District- Sri Ganganagar ----Petitioner Versus 1. P. c. Kishan, District Collector, Sri Ganganagar 2. R. c.
Choudhary, Chief Engineer, Water Resources - North, Hanumangarh 3. Pradeep Rustagi, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Circle, District- Sri Ganganagar 4. Ram Rakh, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources, Sub- Division, Raisinghnagar, District- Sri Ganganagar 5. Kailash Chandra, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, District- Sri Ganganagar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore, AAG assisted by Ms. Chelsi Agarwal (2 of 2) [WCP-982/2016] JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 23/01/2025 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that substantial period has since passed when the construction was raised by the respondents, despite finding that some high handedness has been shown by the respondents, this Court is not inclined to continue with the contempt petitions. 2. These contempt petitions are therefore, dismissed. 3. Notices of contempt petitions are hereby discharged. (DINESH MEHTA),J 118-119-Arun/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.