SABRAM MURMU @ SHOBHRAN MURMU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-07. SABRAM MURMU @ SHOBHRAN MURMU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:JHHC:13612] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3765 of 2026 ------ Sabram Murmu @ Shobhran Murmu, aged about 50 years, S/o- Nunuram Murmu, resident of Village- Chakamanpur, P. O. - Jhinaki, P. S. - Tundi (Muniyadih), District- Dhanbad, (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. P. P ------ Order No. 02 Dated-07-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tisra P. S. Case No. 59 of 2025 (S. T. Case No. 187 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 310 (2) of the B. N. S. , 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted the mobile phone and two pillar cable wire.
It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F. I. R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against him. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17. 01. 2026 as has been mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Dhanbad in connection with Tisra P. S. Case No. 59 of 2025 (S. T. Case No. 187 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Dated-07. 05. 2026-Animesh/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.