P.DEIVEEGAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-12-12. P.DEIVEEGAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP. No. 37302 of 2024 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 12. 12. 2024 Coram : The Honourable Ms. Justice P. T. ASHA Writ Petition No. 37302 of 2024 Deiveegan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Perambalur District. 2. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District. ... Respondents PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 20. 11. 2024 with regard to registration of the petitioner's name by uploading in the computer chitta in respect of property bearing Survey No. 39/9 measuring 0. 21 cents situated at S. Kudikadu Village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District. For Petitioner : Mr. R. Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr. V. Ramesh, GA https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 1/4 WP. No. 37302 of 2024 ORDER Aggrieved by the fact that his representation dated 20. 11.
2024 for uploading his name in the computerized chitta in respect of the property in Survey No. 39/9 measuring 0. 21 cents situated at S. Kudikadu Village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District has not been taken into consideration, the petitioner is before this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate accepting notice for the respondents. 3. The records enclosed along with the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition would reveal that the adangal stands in the name of the petitioner with reference to S. Nos. 39/8 and 39/9 where he is cultivating cotton. The photographs have also been enclosed to show that the petitioner is carrying on cultivation activity. However, his grievance is that though he made a representation dated 20. 11. 2024 to the respondents for uploading his name in the computerized chitta, the said request has not been processed by the respondents. 4.
Considering the fact that the respondents, who are required to pass orders on the request of the petitioner, have failed to perform their duty, the writ petition is allowed and a Mandamus is issued to the https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 2/4 WP. No. 37302 of 2024 second respondent to consider the representation dated 20. 11. 2024 for uploading the petitioner's name in the computerized chitta in respect of the said property and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 12. 12. 2024 To 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Perambalur District. 2. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District. RS https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 3/4 WP. No. 37302 of 2024 P. T. ASHA,J RS WP. No. 37302 of 2024 12. 12. 2024 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 4/4
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.