CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR v. GEETA VASANT BHANDARI AND ANR
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2024-09-26. CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR v. GEETA VASANT BHANDARI AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2024:BHC-GOA:1629 CP 18 of 2024 vinita IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1110 OF 2019, MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1514 OF 2024 (F), MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1515 OF 2024 (F), CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2024, CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2024, MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1516 OF 2024 (F), CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 20 OF 2024, MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1513 OF 2024 (F) CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2024 CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... PETITIONERS Versus GAFFAR KHAN NASSANGATTI AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1110 OF 2019 GAFFAR KHAN NASSANGATTI. , ... PETITIONER Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY (DELETED AS PER ORDER DTD. 15. 6. 2021) AND 3 ORS. , ... RESPONDENTS WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1514 OF 2024 (F) CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... APPLICANT Versus THE CORPORATION OF CITY PANAJI THR ITS COMMISSIONER, ... RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1515 OF 2024 (F) CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ...
APPLICANT Versus THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI THR ITS COMMISSIONER ... RESPONDENT WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2024 CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... PETITIONERS Versus GOPAL KRISHNA BHONGLE AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS 26th September, 2024 CP 18 of 2024 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2024 CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... PETITIONERS Versus GEETA VASANT BHANDARI AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1516 OF 2024 (F) CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... APPLICANT Versus THE CORPORATION OF CITY PANAJI THR. ITS COMMISSIONER ... RESPONDENT WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 20 OF 2024 CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... PETITIONERS Versus NABI SAAB ATTAR ( DECEASED, THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS) AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1513 OF 2024 (F) CELINA ALMEIDA AND ANR ... APPLICANT Versus THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI THR. ITS COMMISSIONER ... RESPONDENT Mr Nigel Fernandes, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 2.
MCA 1515-2024-F Mr H. D. Naik, Advocate for the applicant Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr T. Gawas, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State. MCA 1513-2024-F Mr H. D. Naik, Advocate for the applicant Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr V. Sardessai, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State. Contempt Petition No. 19 of 2024 and 20 of 2024. Mr P. Shirodkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. MCA 1514-2024-F 26th September, 2024 CP 18 of 2024 Mr H. D. Naik, Advocate for the applicant Mr Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr A. Borkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State. MCA 1516-2024-F Mr H. D. Naik, Advocate for the applicant Mr Mr S. Karpe and Mr A. Shirodkar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr G. Shetye, Add. Govt. Advocate for State. CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 26th September, 2024 P. C.
Contempt Petitions filed and replies placed on record clearly show the order stands complied with and structures have been demolished. Accordingly, the contempt petitions stand disposed of as order is complied. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. 26th September, 2024
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.