MUNNI BEGUM & ORS. v. SAIDAN BI & ORS.
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-03-14. MUNNI BEGUM & ORS. v. SAIDAN BI & ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL th ON THE 10 OF APRIL, 2023 FIRST APPEAL No. 53 of 2000 BETWEEN:- 1. MUNNI BEGUM & ORS. , AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WIDOW OF RAJJAK MOHD. (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. ISRAR MOHD. AGED 36 YEARS 3. AVRAR MOHD. ALIAS BABLU, AGED 26 YEARS 4. ABSAR MOHD. ALIAS BABLU, AGED 26 YEARS. 5. FURKAN MOHD. AGED 20 YEARS 6. IMRAN MOHD. AGED 19 YEARS, NOS. 2 TO 6 ALL SONS OF LATE RAJJAK MOHD. ALL CULTIVATORS AND RESIDENT OF KASWA MANDI SALAMATPUR. TAHSIL AND DISTRICT RAISEN (M. P) ..... APPELLANTS (NONE) AND 1. SAIDAN BI & AGED 66 YEARS, WIDOW OF HAFIZ KHAN AND D/O KADAR MOHD, RESIDENT OF KASWA MANDI SALAMATPUR, TAHSIL AND DISTRICT RAISEN (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. AKBAR MOHD, AGED 38 YEARS, SON OF ZAFAR MOHD. 3. ZAFAR MOHD. AGED 88 YEARS, SON OF PEER MOHD. NOS. 2 AND 3 BOTH RESIDENT OF KASWA MANDI SALAMATPUR, TAHSIL AND DISTRICT RAISEN (M. P) 4. MOHD.
YUSUF, AGED 40 YEARS SON OF MOHAMMI HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF BAND MASTER COURAHA, CHANDU MIYAN KI BUDHWARA, BHOPAL (M. P) 5. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH COLLECTOR, RAISEN (M. P) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE) This appeal coming on for direction this day, th e court passed the following: Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRASHANT Signing time: 4/11/2023 5:10:29 PM ORDER None for parties. On the last date i. e. 20. 02. 2023 also, none had appeared on behalf of the parties, therefore, this Court passed the following order:- "None for parties. Registry is directed to issue SPC to both the parties for 10. 04. 2023. It is made clear that if on the next date of hearing none appears on behalf of the appellants, this Court shall be at liberty to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. List on 10. 04. 2023" Today also none has appeared on behalf of the parties even after issuance of SPC.
It appears that the appellants have lost their interest in prosecuting this first appeal, therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim application(s), if any, shall stand dismissed. (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE SN Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRASHANT Signing time: 4/11/2023 5:10:29 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.