KAVITA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: KULDEEP MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-03-18. KAVITA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:12825] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 1669/2024 Kavita Tripathi W/o Sh. Rohit Tripathi, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 255A, Talwandi, Kota (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Amari W/o Sh. Partha, R/o Village Gadriawas, Dhoinda, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj. ) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar, PP Mr. Pushkar Tamini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 18/03/2024 The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. have been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR No. 43/2024 registered at Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand, for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 419 and 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the parties have settled their disputes and have arrived at a compromise.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on a decision of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012)10 SCC 303]. He therefore prayed that the impugned FIR may kindly be quashed. [2024:RJ-JD:12825] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1669/2024] Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the factum of compromise and submits that in view of the compromise, the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh (Supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers under Section 482 Cr. P. C. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed. The FIR No. 43/2024 registered at Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand, for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 419 and 120-B of IPC and all subsequent proceedings sought to be taken thereunder against the petitioner, is quashed.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 252-divya/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.