Vedere Sri Aurobindo v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-15. Vedere Sri Aurobindo v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECE[/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 22135 OF 2020 Between: Vedere Sri Aurobindo, S/o V. Jithendranath Reddy, Aged 60 years, Occ. Business, Rio Flat No. 101, H. No. 3-6-131/1, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Greater Hyderabad [,/unicipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. 16, GHI\,4C, Hyderabad. 4 The Asst. City Planner, Circle No. 16, GHMC, Hyderabad. (R-2 C. T. is amended as per Court Order, dated 15. 12. 2O2O in l. A. No. 2 of 2020. ) ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Wrlt, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the Representations dated 0410812020 and 2111012020 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, violation of principles of nalural lustice and also contrary to lhe provrsions of GHI\,4C Act and consequently direct the respondents to consider representation dated O4l08/2020 and 2111012020 forthwith with a further direction to issue final proceedings of BPS proceedings. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to issue final proceedings of BPS proceedings No.
13096/Cir9/CZl GHMC/2008 granted by the 2nd Respondent in respect of Flat No. 101, bearing H. No. 3-6-13'1/1/101 in Srinivasa Towers situated at Street No. 18, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN OEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22135 of 2O2O ORDER: Fleard the lcarncd counsr. l for thc pctitioner. the learnecl Government Pleader for Mr-inicipal Admir-ristration and Urban Development for respondent No. 1 , and Sri Pasham Krishna Redd1 , the learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing lor respondent Nos. 2 to 4. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed oI zrt the stage of admission.
The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondents are not considerinq the representations dated 04,08. 2020 and 21. 10. 2020 submitted by him sceking to issuc certified copy of the llnal BPS proceedings along u,ith map in respect ol Flar No,101 beilring Il. No. 3 6 131. /1//101, Sriniv:rsa l\ru'ers, Street No. 18, Hin'ra,vathnagar, llvderabad. 'lhe Standing Counsel, or instructiolrs, sL:rtes that duc 1. o varior. ls administratir,c cxigencics, thc prcscnt panclemic siLuation prci,zLiirng in tht- Statc :rnrl thc Gl iMC Elcctions, lhc rcpresenLations datccl 04. 08. 2U10 lnd 2 L i (1. 2U20. sr-rbmrtLcd bl the petitioner could nor be consirlcrcri and seeks sonrc timr: for passing necessary orders on the said rcpr-cse ntations, in accordance with 1aw. In view of the above made submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to consider the representations dated 04. 08. 2020 and 21. 10.
2O2O submitted by the petitioner and pass necess. rrJ/ orders thereon, strictll, ln accordancc with Iarv, as expeditiousll- as possible, preferably within a pcrrocl of lirnr s'ceks Il'om tht: datu of rcceipt of at cop_r, of this orcler. It is nt',:dli:ssr to mlr-ttion thrrt boltrre p:rssirrg artv orciers, the petitioner shal1 be put on notice and afforded an opportunity of hearing. A copy of the order passed by the competent authoritY shall bc communicated to the petitioner' Thc ntisccliancor-ts pi:titiot-ls pending, if anr'. shall sLand 'lherc to costs. closed. shali be no ordcr . Is SD/-B. SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,rRUE coPY/' a* L*, -. - SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, l\,4unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad I\/unicipal Corporation, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. 16, GHN/C, Hyderabad. 4 The Asst. City PIanner, Circle No.
16, GHtvlC, Hyderabad 5 One CC to Sri. Gudi l\,4adhusudhan Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] 6 Two CCs to GP for l\,4unicipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 7. One CC to Sri Pasham Krishna Reddy, SC FOR GHMC IOPUC] 8. Two CD Copies CHR . -$"-- HIGH COURT DATED:1 511212020 t{e STA r€ 1 v o 2m c o 2gI)EC ORDER * DFii a'i W. P. No. 22135 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS . -9
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.