J.Vamsi Krishna v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: E.V. VENUGOPAL

Judgment date: 2025-12-22

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-22. J.Vamsi Krishna v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 32s9 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENW SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO:29880 OF 2023 Between: 1. J. Vamsi Krishna, S/o. J. Boyi Reddy, Aged 40 years, Occ. Business, Rl,/o. Plot No. 33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-500073, Telangana. 2. K. V. Sesha Reddy, S/o. K. Pitchi Reddy, Aged 65 years, Occ. Business, Native of Mudivarthi Village, Vidavalur Mandal, Nellore District, presently residing at Plot No. 33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-500073, Telangana. .. PETITIONERS AND 1 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, At Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, At Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 3. The Tahsildhar, Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. i 4. Sargari Veera Reddy, S/o. Late S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.

Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. 5. Sargari Krishna Reddy, S/o. Late S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, R/o. Bowrarnpet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. ) 6. Sargari Raji Reddy, S/o. S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 7. Sargari Ravinder Reddy, S/o. S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Fi/o. Bowrampet Village rGand imaisa m ma-D undigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. B. Sargari Ranga Reddy, S/o. S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Ri. /o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 9. Sargari Bheem Reddy, S/o. S. Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 10. Kolan Yadi Reddy, S/o. Late K. Tulsi Reddy, Aged Majo' Occ. Business,. Rl/o. H. No.

1-13l3, Tullsi Villa, Nizampet, Near Govt. Schct l, Nizampet Village' DundigalGandimaisamma Manda[, Medchal-Malkajgiri Di trict. '1 l. Smt. K. Sreelatha Reddy, S/o. K. Mahipal Reddy, D/o S. Yella Reddy'. Aged about- 32 years, Oci. Hor. rsewife, Fl/o. H. No. '1-13/l Nizampet Village, Quthubullapur, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 12. B. Subba Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, Aged at'r ut 49 years, Occ' Business, Fyo. H. No. 3-4 1 7/2, Sheshadri Nagar' Kukatpz I y, Hyderabad. 13. Police Govinda Reddy, S/o. Raghunandan Reddy, Agerl rbout 59 years, Occ. Business, Fyo. H. N6. 2-72, Bowrampet Village, Dun'i3al-Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 14. N. srinivas Reddy, S/o. Pandurangareddy, Aged 38 ars, Occ. Business, 1'r - I Medchal- R/o. H. No. 3-85, Bourampet, Ganlimaisamma-Dundig; Mandal, Malkajgiri District. l5. Akinaboyina Nagaraju, S/o. Ramalingayya, Aged 44 / :ars, Occ Business, Fyo. s-44, Bahaduipally, GandimaGa'mma Dunding3 Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. Occ. 16.

Mandha Pradeep Reddy, S/o. M. Ravinder Reddy, ,1 44 yeers, led ( Business, Rl/o. Ptot No. 308, A-Block, Subishi ovutham, Kompalle, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, IVIedchal-Malkajgiri t istrict. Venkata 17. M/s. M. V. V. Housing Society, Rep. by its Mulla I rdi Veera Satyanarayana, Aged SZ year-, R/o. 4-68-3, Lawsons Ei; y Colony, L. B. Nagar, Visikhapalnam (Urban), Andhra Pradesh-53001 7. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be. pleased to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the rature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in unblc< <ing certain survey numbers for entertaining and registering the sale dee,i; presented by the '1 Respondents No.

14 to 7, despite knowing the fact that ttrr transactions on the said survey numbers were blocked on the applications mit e by the Petitioners 'ent under Court Case lntimation in Dharani Portal under diffe applications, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently, direct the Respondent No. 3 not to give i ny effect to the Sale Deeds bearing Doc. Nos. 387l2023,38812023 and 38912023, all dated 0110912023 in view of Court Case lntimation in Dharani Portal vid: Nos. C12300019802' C12300020057, C|2300019842 and C|2300020054 dated 2i to412023 filed by the Petitioners and also direct the Respondent No. 3 to : rntinue the blocked transactions of the lands in respect Survey Nos. 537 t"D/<t1 , 371eo/e"f , $7 tubf 1, s37ro/e/2, s37teo/ty't, 537t@/y2, 5371-fl2, 537t@/8/4. 537tv/a . *7t E+ , fi7te Gandimaisamma-Dundigal , 537/ , 5371 6, and 537/61, of Bowrampet Village, "i Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri ' District, admeasuring Ac. 4-19 Gts.

situated Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District which are reflecting in the names of Respondents No. 4 to 15 and 17, pursuant to the Applications made by the Petitioners with regard to Court Case lntimation in Dharani lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to continue the blocked transactions of the lands in respect of Survey Nos. 537/ty'. / , 5371-/-h, *7tu/at/1 , 537h4'/2, 5371"t/8/l , fi7W, fi7t-43, *7tE8/4, s37tb/d,537t 4$ . fi7t C , 537lA , 537i &and 537/ &r of Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, which are reflecting in the names of Respondents No.

4 to 15 & 17, pursuant to the Applications made by the Petitioners with regard to Court Case lntimation in Dharani, pending disposal of this writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI ROHIT POGULA Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10 & 12: SRI N. VENKATESHWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No. 14 : SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 6,7 to 9, 11,13, 15 to 17: -- ) The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF I ELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V. VE]! I UGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 29 88O of 2O2 I Dated: 22. L2. 2O25 Between: )etitioners J. Vamsi Krishna and another And The State of Telangana, Represented by its SecretarY, Revenue Department artd sixteen others Respondents ORDER Mr.

Rohit Pogula, learned counsel for the cetitioners, by addressing a letter to the Registrar (Judicial), {igh Court for -the State of Telalgana, sceks permission o this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded . 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is lismissed as withdrawn. There sha,ll be no order as to costs Miscellarr. eous petitions pending, if arL , shali stand \ closed. RAO SD/. S, li ALLIKARJUNA \ AS f srANT REGIgTEAK //TRUE COPY// t\ ECTION OFFICER To, ROHIT POGULA' Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI RAO' Advocat: IOPUCI 2. One CC to SRI N. VENKATESHWARA -- 3. One CC to SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. tourj / 5. Two CD Copies PVL BS l#, }. HIGH COURT DATED:2211212025 \ \ . --':= ',-. 1 'ii2ii -ll L) 0 5 lr i '! l ORDER + ,. ; * ' )i: ? :1 . :lr' 'll \:'-:.. /' S)... ,r.. I WP. No. 29880 of 2023 l. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.