ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: PANKAJ BHANDARI,SHUBHA MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-19. ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:52249-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1210/2024 In D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20434/2023 Atc Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited, Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Sumer Jangid, Aged About 40 Years, S/o Ramavtar Jangid Having Its Registered Office At 2Nd Floor, Pooja Tower, Near Gopal Pura By-Pass, Tonk Road Jaipur, Rajasthan Presently Know As Elevar Digital Infrastructure Private Limited. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development And Housing Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005. 2. Mr. Manoj Verma, Deputy Commissioner, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone Ambabadi Samudayik Bhawan, Ambabadi Circle, Jaipur-302029. 3. Dr. Jitendra Kumar Soni, Chairman, District Telecom Committee Office of District Collector, Collectorate Campus, 230, Madho Singh Road, Bani Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302006. 4. Ms.
Vandita Kaul, Secretary, Department of Telecommunications Sanchar Bhawan 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001. 5. Mr. Vaibhav Galriya, Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development And Housing Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005. 6. Mr. Kumar Pal Gautam, Director, Department of Local Self-Government G-3, Rajmalhal Residencial Area, C- Scheme, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302016. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suveer Gaur with Mr. Parneet Kaur & Ms. Gazal Gupta on behalf of Mr. Ajatshatru Mina [2024:RJ-JP:52249-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1210/2024] For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/12/2024 1. Petitioner has filed this civil contempt petition alleging contempt of the order dated 09. 04. 2024. 2. As Nagar Nigam which has issued the seizure memo notice was not made a party in the main writ petition, we are not inclined to entertain the present civil contempt petition. 3.
Consequently, the present Civil Contempt Petition is dismissed. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J LAKSHYA-DAKSH/44
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.