Sri A. Ekambaram Naicker v. K. Venkatachalapathi Naicker
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: JUSTICE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-05-08. Sri A. Ekambaram Naicker v. K. Venkatachalapathi Naicker. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR. V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 577 OF 2013 Appeal filed under section 96 of CPC aggrieved by the judgment and decree made in OS No. 17 of 2008, on the file of the court of the District Judge. Chittoor, dated 22-02-2013 Between: Sri A. Ekambaram Naicker, S/o. K. Ramaiah, aged about 68 years, Occ: Agriculturist, Residing at Palamaner Post & Mandal, Chittoor District ... Appellant/Defendant No. 2 AND 1. K. Venkatachalapathi Naicker, S/o. Varadarajulu Naicker, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Agriculturist, Residing at Pathikonda Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District 2. K. Varadarajulu Naicker, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged about 65 years, Hindu, Occ; Agriculturist. Residing at Pathikonda Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District 3. Sulochanamma, W/o. Lingappa, aged about 70 years, Hindu, dependant.
Residing at Sairam Street Palamaner Post & Mandal, Chittoor District ... Respondents/Plaintiffs 4. K. Subramanyam Naicker, S/o. Gopal Naicker, Aged about 43 years. Occ: Agriculturist, Residing at Pathikonda Gangavaram Mandal Chittoor District 5. K. Gopal Naicker ( died ) 6. Vallamma, W/o Venugopal, Aged about 40 years, Hindu, Occ: Agriculturist, Residing at Gantavuru Palamaner Mandal, Chittoor District ...
Respondents/Defendants lA NO: 2 OF 2Q1« Petition under Order XXII Rule 9 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the appellant in the above appeal lA NO: 3 OF 2ni« Petition under Order XXII Rule 3 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner come on record as Legal Representatives of Deceased Appellant lA NO: 4 OF 201« Petition under Order XXII Rule 4 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the proposed Respondents 7 to 10 on record as Legal Representatives of Deceased Respondent No.
2 in the above Appeal lA NO: 1 OF 2099 Petition under Order 1 Rule 10 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Petitioners as Respondents No. 7 to 22 in the above appeal A. S. No. 577 of 2013 as well as in the interlocutory applications in the appeal suit. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. R V Reddy & Associates Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 4; Sri. Venkateswarlu Sanisetty Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri. S V Muni Reddy Counsel for other Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH APHC010196502013 AT AMARAVATl [3365] SMS (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY. THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE honourable JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR FIRST APPEAL NO: 577/2013 Between; ... appellant A. Ekambaram Naicker AND ...
RESPONDENT(S) K Venkatachalapathi Naicker and Others The Court made the following judgment: Nos. 1 and 4 and learned 1. Learned counsel for Respondent counsel for Respondent No. 6 are present. This has been so on 2. No representation for the Appellant all earlier occasions also. under the caption ‘for dismissal. 3. Today the matter is listed representation for the Appellant. However, there is no 4. In the result, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ^ TATA RAO deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// To, SECTI OFFICER 1- The District Judge: Chittoor, Chittoor District, (with 2. One CC to Sri. records if any) R V Reddy & Associates Advocate [OPUCJ 3. One CC to Sri. Venkateswariu Sanisetty Advocate fOPUCJ 4. One CC to Sri. S V Muni Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V. R. Section, High Court otA. P. at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2024 JUDGMENT AS.
No. 577 of 2013 ^V3RT Or L % DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT slowed FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.