RASILABEN SUVASHCHANDRA GANATRA v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2026-06-15. RASILABEN SUVASHCHANDRA GANATRA v. STATE OF GUJARAT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 736 of 2013 ======================================================== RASILABEN SUVASHCHANDRA GANATRA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ======================================================== Appearance: BAILABLE WARRANT SERVED for the Applicant(s) No. 1 HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS. TITHI Y. THAKKAR(18920) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR JAGDHISH SATAPARA(5524) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ======================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S. V. PINTO Date : 15/06/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned advocate Ms. Tithi Thakker submis that she has instruction to appear for the applicant. Accordingly, learned advocate Ms. Tithi Thakkar is permitted to file her appearance for the applicant. 2.
Learned advocate for the applicant submits that applicant Rasilaben Suvashchandra Ganatra had filed Criminal Case No. 10832 of 2006 against the respondent no. 2 Minaben Rameshbhai Garnara before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot under Section 138 of the Negotiable th Instruments Act. Learned 6 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot, by judgment and order dated 21. 01. 2011, convicted the respondent no. 2 Minaben Rameshbhai Garnara and sentenced to simple imprisonment of 12 months and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, simple imprisonment of 02 months for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act. 3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed in Criminal Case No. 10832 of 2006, the respondent no. 2 Minaben Rameshbhai Garnara filed Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2011 before the Sessions Court, Rajkot and th learned 9 Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot allowed the criminal appeal and by judgment and order dated 15. 02.
2013, quashed and set aside the judgment and order of conviction th passed by learned 6 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. 4. Accordingly, Criminal Case No. 10832 of 2006 was th pending before the Court of learned 14 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot. 5. Learned advocate for the applicant further submits that during pendency of the criminal case, the parties have amicably settled the matter and the respondent no. 2 – original complainant filed a pursis at Exh. 139 to withdraw Criminal Case No. 10832 of 2006 before the National Lok Adalat. Accordingly, on 08. 05. 2016, Criminal Case No. 10832 of 2006 came to be withdrawn in the National Lok Adalat. 6. In view of the above development, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application. 7. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The present application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. (S. V. PINTO,J) F. S. KAZI
Source: High Court of Gujarat. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.