RAJENDER KUMARJ BISHNOI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. RAJENDER KUMARJ BISHNOI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38260] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17867/2026 CNR: RJHC010766002026 | URN: CW / 31007U / 2026 Rajender Kumar Bishnoi S/o Hanuman Prasad Bishnoi, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 1 M L K - B Jalwali Gharsana Ganganagar Raj. Presently Posted As Lecturer (I- Gr/hindi Literature) At Govt. Senior Secondary School Nai Mandi Gharsana (212119) Ganganagar ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Dept. Of School Education Govt. Of Raj. Govt. Secretariat Jaipur Raj. 2. The Director, Secondary Education Raj. Bikaner 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Sri Ganganagar 4. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School Nai Mandi Gharsana (212119) Ganganagar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. RDSS Kharlia For Respondent(s) : Mr. N. K. Mehta, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 29. 04.
2026, the petitioner was transferred from Office of Directorate, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner to Govt. Senior Secondary School, Nai Mandi, Gharsana, where he joined. However, merely after a period of two months, the petitioner has been transferred vide the order impugned dated 10. 07. 2026 from Ganganagar to Govt. Senior Secondary School, Beriyala, Jaisalmer which is about 505 kms away and it is a matter of change of Division. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be [2026:RJ-JP:38260] (2 of 2) [CW-17867/2026] permitted to file a representation before the respondents which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 2. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AGC appearing on behalf of the respondents and he submits that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been effected but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation before the Grievance Committee constituted vide office order dated 17. 07.
2026 for resolving the issues pertaining to single women/widow/divorcee/ employees suffering grave illness and many other issues. He submits that the petitioner can file her representation before the Grievance Committee, which will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner in an expeditious manner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced and also the fact that a Grievance Committee has been constituted vide office order dated 17. 07. 2026, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file representation Committee within a period of seven days from today and the Committee shall decide the representation within a period of fifteen days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law by way of passing a speaking order. 5. Till the decision of the representation, the impugned order dated 10. 07.
2026 shall remain stayed qua the petitioner, in case, the petitioner has not joined at the new place of posting. 6. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to file the representative within a period of seven days from today, the interim order granted by this Court shall stand vacated automatically. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 64/Rajesh Prajapat
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.