CHETRAM v. KARTIK GOND
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-04. CHETRAM v. KARTIK GOND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL th ON THE 4 OF JANUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 546 of 2022 BETWEEN:- CHETRAM S/O BHAVROO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O VILLAGE HARRAI TEHSIL PUSHPARAJGARH DISTRICT ANUPPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANT (NONE) AND 1. KARTIK GOND S/O THOOTHA GOND, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE GUVARA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DINDORI M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SEVAKRAM S/O GONE, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. RADHE LAL S/O BHOOKHA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. BAJRANG S/O DUNDDI, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 5.
RAM SINGH S/O DUNDDI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. TAPAI SINGH S/O DUNDDI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR Signature Not Verified Signed by: VAISHALI Signing time: 1/6/2024 4:57:03 PM (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. KODU LAL S/O DUNDDI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. MAAN SINGH S/O CHAMPARIHA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. KHULEL S/O CHAMPARIHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. SAMPAT SINGH S/O CHAMPARIHA (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS SUNHAR), AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 11.
BAISHAN S/O CHAMPARIHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 12. KUNWAR SINGH S/O DHOLI SINGH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE PADHARIYA TEHSIL PUSHPARAJGARH DISTRICT ANUPPUR M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 13. SUKHDEV S/O HEERALAL, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 14. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT ANUPPUR M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 15. DHEERAN SINGH S/O SAMPAT SINGH R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 16. SUKHLAL S/O DASROO SINGH R/O VILLAGE HARRAI, TAHSIL PUSHPRAJGARH, DISTRICT ANUPPUR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: VAISHALI Signing time: 1/6/2024 4:57:03 PM 17. ISHWARI BAI W/O MANORATH SINGH MARKO R/O VILLAGE MOHANDI TEHSIL PUSHPARAJGARH DISTRICT ANUPPUR M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 18.
PRATIMA SINGH W/O MANOJ SINGH R/O VILLAGE KHATI TEHSIL PUSHAPARAJGARH DISTRICT ANUPPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Perus al of the order-sheets reveals that on previous date i. e. on 23. 01. 2023, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today also, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. I t appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. Therefore, present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE vai Signature Not Verified Signed by: VAISHALI Signing time: 1/6/2024 4:57:03 PM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.