RENUBALA BARIK v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-03. RENUBALA BARIK v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 11350 of 2025 Renubala Barik …. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Mahanty, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha …. Opposite Parties 2. Surendra Das Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC Mr. S. Das, Advocate (Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 03. 12. 2025 Order No. 02. 1. Mr. S. Das, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the informant by filing Vaklatanama in Court. The same is taken on record. The name of Mr. Das, learned counsel be reflected in the file, cause list as well as CMS of this Court. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 3. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G. R. Case No. 666 of 2025 pending on the file of learned J. M. F. C. , Chandabali, arising out of Bansada P. S. Case No. 279 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 85, 103(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 r/w section 4 of D. P. Act. 4.
Taking into account the nature of allegations, such concession is immaterial. 5. This Court perused the statement of that of the children of the deceased to indicate that their mother had stated that she had taken poison. 6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail, inter alia, on the ground that investigation is still continuing under Section 103 of BNS. 7. Considering the prima facie material vis-‡-vis the accusation relating to the Petitioner and the statements on record and keeping in view the parameters for consideration of anticipatorybail as reiterated in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation & another, reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 452, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper. 8.
It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U. C. C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Signature Not Verified Judge Digitally Signed Soumya Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 06-Dec-2025 13:59:12
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.