MUHAMMED ANEESH v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-08-11. MUHAMMED ANEESH v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 20TH SRAVANA, 1942 WP(C). No. 15909 OF 2020(K) PETITIONER : MUHAMMED ANEESH, S/O. HASSAN, 5/369, PANDIKASALAMANGALASERRI, FEROKE P. O. , KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI. K. V. GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S) : 1 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CIVIL STATION, ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673020. 2 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673020. SRI K. P HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11. 08. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C). No. 15909 OF 2020(K) 2 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~ The petitioner applied for grant of a regular permit to operate service on the route Pullikkadavu - Kunnathupalam.
The route enquiry revealed that the said route will be highly beneficial to persons travelling to the government hospital Chanda which lies en route. The prayer in this petition is to direct the respondents to consider and pass final orders on Ext. P1 application seeking issuance of regular permit. 2. Sri. K. P. Harish, the learned Government Pleader on instructions, submits that the permit has been sought for in respect of a new route, a fresh route enquiry is required to be conducted. It is submitted that the 1st respondent shall expedite the proceedings after obtaining a report. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions made across the Bar, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take up Exhibit-P1 and pass appropriate orders, after hearing the petitioner as well as the affected parties, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
It is for the 1st respondent to consider as to whether Rule 130 of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules need to be resorted to for expediting WP(C). No. 15909 OF 2020(K) 3 the proceedings. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with the judgment before the respondents to ensure compliance. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE ps/11/8/2020 WP(C). No. 15909 OF 2020(K) 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE PRESCRIBED FOR P. ST. S. A. DATED 4. 3. 2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ROUTE ENQUIRY REPORT. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P. A. TO JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.