SMT DEVARAJAMMA v. SHANTHA KUMAR
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: V SRISHANANDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-09. SMT DEVARAJAMMA v. SHANTHA KUMAR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRP No. 450 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 450 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SMT DEVARAJAMMA W/O LATE GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT BEHIND JANAPRIYA APARTMENTS KADABAGEREVILLAGE AND POST DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 562 162 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA S. , ADVOCATE) AND: SHANTHA KUMAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B 1. SMT. GEETHA Location: High Court of W/OLATE SHANTHA KUMAR Karnataka AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT BIDARAKERE VILLAGE BANDIGENELE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432 2. SRI. SOMASHEKARA B S S/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS - 2 - CRP No. 450 of 2024 3. SRI. MANJUNATHA B S S/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 4.
SRI GUNASHEKAR S/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/AT BIDARAKERE VILLAGE BANDIGENELE HOBI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT SINCE RESPONDENT NO. 4 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN I. E. RESPONDENT NO. 1 WHO IS THEIR MOTHER 5. SRI K. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE KALAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT KADABAGERE VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBIL, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 562 162 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC. 115 OF CPC. , AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18. 04. 2024. PASSED ON IA NO. 6 IN OS NO. 433/2016 ON THE FILE OF C/C. IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA, REJECTING THE IA NO. 6 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC. , FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - CRP No. 450 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "The petitioner in the above case submits that the above petition is not pressed and the same may be dismissed as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity. " Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC ct:SG List No. : 1 Sl No. : 11
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.