BINEESH BABU, v. STATE OF KERALA,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2026-02-06. BINEESH BABU, v. STATE OF KERALA,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TH WEDNESDAY, THE 24 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 40183 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 BINEESH BABU, AGED 31 YEARS S/O M S BABU, MARAMATTATHIL HOUSE, AMBARANIRAPPIL (P. O. ), KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686578 2 VINOD, AGED 39 YEARS PUTHENVEEDU, EDAMATTAM, POOVARANY, IDAMATTOM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686578 BY ADV NIDHI BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALA REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, PIN - 686575 3 THE ASSISTANT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, PALA, PIN - 686575 4 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686575 5 BHARANANGANAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, BHARANGANAM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686578 BY ADV Prakash C. Vadakkan J.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24. 07. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 40183 OF 2023 JUDGMENT This matter was called on the first call and in revised call as well. Neither in the first call nor in the revised call, anyone has appeared to represent the matter. In view thereof, it appears that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the writ petition, which is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Nsd NO.
40183 OF 2023 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40183/2023 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO KL3535/541/2017 DATED 27/4/22 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER'S FATHER TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO KL 2023-CC-9795B DATED 14/3/23 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24/6/23 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24/6/23 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 24/6/23 BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24/6/23 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24/6/23 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24/6/23 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24/6/23 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO 400487/GGDC08/GPO/2023/4082/(1) DATED 10/7/23 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.