SRI K R SAHASRANAM v. M/S LILASONS ALCOBEV PVT. LTD.
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-12. SRI K R SAHASRANAM v. M/S LILASONS ALCOBEV PVT. LTD. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CMP No. 371 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 371 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI K R SAHASRANAM S/O K N RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS REPRESENTED BY VIKRAM R/A AT NO. 645, 6TH MAIN HAL 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 075. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATHGOWDA B R. , ADVOCATE) AND: M/S LILASONS ALCOBEV PVT LTD. , A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FLAT NO. 601, HI TECH CITY MADHAPUR ROAD, HYDERABAD 560 081. TELANGANA. REP. BY MR B LAKSHMINARAYANA RAO AGED 53 YEARS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Digitally signed by SHWETHA OF M/S LIASONS ALCOBEV PVT. LTD RAGHAVENDRA …RESPONDENT Location: HIGH THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) COURT OF OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996.
PRAYING TO KARNATAKA APPOINT ANY RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE UPON THE CONTRA CLAIMS BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ARBITRATION CENTRE, BANGALORE. AS PER THE AGREEMENT DATED 01-02-2021 AT ANNEXURE A OF THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE PARA NO. 15 TO SERVE THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 2 - CMP No. 371 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: Wherefore, the petitioner herein respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to appoint any retired District Judge, as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the contra claims between the Petitioner and Respondent before the Arbitration Centre, Bangalore. As per the Agreement dated 01-02-2021 at ANNEXURE A of the Arbitration clause Para No. 15 to serve the interest of justice and equity. 2.
None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28. 11. 2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No. : 1 Sl No. : 136
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.