AARTI MEENA v. BOARD OF REVENUE
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. AARTI MEENA v. BOARD OF REVENUE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38113] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18586/2026 CNR: RJHC010782332026 | URN: CW / 32082U / 2026 Aarti Meena W/o Vikram Singh Meena D/o Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Baijwadi, Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Board Of Revenue, Through The Registrar, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur Division, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. District Collector (Land Record), Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. The Tehsildar, Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gulab Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. R. Paliwal, Dy. GC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is working as Patwari and vide order impugned dated 10. 07.
2026, she has been transferred from Patwar Mandal, Hapawas, Tehsil Nangal, Rajawatan District Dausa to Tehsil Kareda, District Bhilwara. The respondents have simply transferred to Tehsil Kareda, District Bhilwara and no patwar mandal has been allotted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a [2026:RJ-JP:38113] (2 of 2) [CW-18586/2026] representation before the respondents, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposed the aforesaid submissions and submits that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been made, but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on the ground raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed of at this stage. 3.
In view of the submissions made, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondents for ventilating the grievance within a period of seven days from today and the same shall be decided within a period of fifteen days thereafter, by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Till the decision of the representation, the impugned transfer order dated 10. 07. 2026 shall remain stayed qua the petitioner, if the petitioner has not joined at new place of posting. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to file a representation within a period of seven days from today, the interim order granted by this Court shall stand vacated automatically. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 113/Rajesh Prajapat
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.