Chandi Prasad Gupta v. Budhpriya Borkar
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2025-05-01. Chandi Prasad Gupta v. Budhpriya Borkar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:CGHC:20085 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 74 of 2019 1 - Chandi Prasad Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta, R/o Halwai Line, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Maya Prasad Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta, R/o Halwai Line, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Bhavesh Gosai S/o Krishna Rao Gosai Aged About 40 Years R/o Tulsipur Ward No. 16, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Vinay Jha S/o Ganesh Prasad Jha, R/o Baldeobagh, Ward No. 14, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Budhpriya Borkar S/o M. L. Borker Aged About 50 Years R/o Kourinbhat, Rajnandgaon Cg At Present R/o Deputy Manager, Hindustan Copper Project, Malajkhand, District Balaghat Mp Through Power Of Attorney Sanghpriya Borker S/o M. L.
Borker Aged About 48 Years, R/o Kourinbhat, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhuvan Das S/o Late Baliram R/o Village Dharmapur, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Duleshwar S/o Baliram, R/o Village Dharmapur, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ashok Sahu Ph No. 36, Karouinbhata, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ghanshyam Koushik, Revenue Inspector Kourinbhat, Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Office, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : None present. For Respondents No. : Mr. Santosh Soni, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chadravanshi Order on Board 01/05/2025 1.
On previous two dates of hearing, none appeared for the appellants nor represented through counsel. Today also, despite repeated calls neither appellants appeared nor represented by any counsel, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the misc. appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the misc. appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Amit/- Digitally signed AMIT by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY KUMAR Date: 2025. 05. 03 DUBEY 11:46:08 +0530
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.