Sumanta Saha v. Tripura University (A Central University) and 5 others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-05-15. Sumanta Saha v. Tripura University (A Central University) and 5 others. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
TRHC010000322025 2026:THC:625 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO. 09 OF 2025 Sumanta Saha, S/o. Sri Suresh Chandra Saha, Unnayan Sangha, near Sankaracharya School, A. D. Nagar, Agartala, The Petitioner West Tripura, Age-43 years ……. Petitioner(s) -Versus- 1. Tripura University, (A Central University), Established by Tripura University Act, 2006, being represented by the Registrar, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, District West Tripura, PIN - 799022 2. The Registrar, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, District - West Tripura, PIN - 799022 3. The Vice Chancellor, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, District - West Tripura, PIN - 799022 4. The University Grants Commission, to be represented by the Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 5. Dr. Rajesh Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Centre for Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy (CSEIP), Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, District - West Tripura, PIN - 799022 6.
Dr. Nanigopal Debnath, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Centre for Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy (CSEIP), Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, District - West Tripura, PIN-799022 ..... Respondent(s) Present: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate. Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate. Mr. K. Nath, Advocate. Ms. A. Debbarma, Advocate. Mr. D. Paul, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. N. Majumder, Sr. Advocate. Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, Sr. Advocate. Mr. R. K. P. Singh, Advocate. Mr. B. Paul, Advocate. Mr. T. K. Debbarma, Advocate. Mr. K. Paul, Advocate. Mr. D. J. Saha, Advocate. Mr. G. Saha, Advocate. Mr. E. Debbarma, Advocate. Mr. B. De, Advocate. 15. 05. 2026 HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD Order 1. When the case is called, both the sides are present. 2. In view of subsequent developments, the writ petitioner has filed a fresh writ petition, docketed as WP(C) No. 314 of 2026. Consequently, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE suhanjit Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA SINGHA Date: 2026. 05. 16 12:34:49 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.