SHRI TIATEMSU v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-09-30. SHRI TIATEMSU v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/4 GAHC020004932024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/125/2024 SHRI TIATEMSU S/O SHRI PANJUNGMANEN PERMANENT R/O MOLUNGYIMSEN VILLAGE TULI, MOKOKCHUNG-798618 NAGALAND VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISATRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI 2:THE COLONEL RECORDS ASSAM REGIMENT SHILLONG MEGHALAYA 3:THE COMMANDING OFFICER 17TH ASSAM REGIMENT LUCKNOW PIN-(ARMY)-910417 C/O 56 APO 4:THE BRIGADIER ASSAM REGIMENT CENTRE (ARC) HAPPY VALLY SHILLONG-7 MEGHALAYA PIN ARMY-900332 C/P 99 APO PIN-21101 Page No. # 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER, Advocate for the Respondent : CGSC, Linked Case : WP(C)/75/2024 SHRI TIATEMSU S/O SHRI PANGJUNGMANEN PERMANENT R/O MOLUNGYIMSEN VILLAGE TULI MOKOKCHUNG NAGALANDF VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF INDIA MINISATRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI 2:THE COLONEL RECORDS ASSAM REGIMENT SHILLONG MEGHALAYA 3:THE COMMANDING OFFICER 17TH ASSAM REGIMENT LUCKNOW PIN-(ARMY)-910417 C/O 56 APO 4:THE BRIGADIER ASSAM REGIMENT CENTRE (ARC) HAPPY VALLY SHILLONG-7 MEGHALAYA PIN ARMY-900332 C/P 99 APO Page No. # 3/4 PIN-211014 ------------ For the petitioner(s)/applicant(s) : Mr. Nocklet M. Advocate. On behalf of SENTIYANGE For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Yangerwati, CGC – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY 30. 09. 2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/writ petitioner has submitted that the arguing counsel has some difficulties to argue to the matter today. The matter comes upon for consideration of I. A. (Civil) 125/2024 with the prayer for substituting the respondent No. 1, i. e. “Union of India, represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt.
of India, New Delhi”, by “Union of India, represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi”. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection if the prayer is allowed. In such circumstances, the prayer for substitution of the respondent No. 1 in WA No. 75/2024 is allowed and the “Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India” is substituted by “Ministry of Defence, Government of India” as respondent No. 2 in the writ appeal. Page No. # 4/4 Learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner is directed to file the amended Cause-title during the course of the day. Mr. Yangerwati, learned counsel appearing for the Central Government accepts notice on behalf of the substituted respondent No. 1. List the matter tomorrow (01. 10. 2024). JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.