Shaik Raheem Jahangir v. THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-21. Shaik Raheem Jahangir v. THE STATE OF TELANGANA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
134441 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO:492 OF m26 Between: 1. Shaik Raheem Jahangir, S/o Late Sk Ameer Aged about. 60 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 8-2-74, Ali Colony, Old Bowenpally 2. Shaik Abdul Nabee, S/o Sk RaheemJahangir, Aged about. 30 years Occ. Pvt employee, Fl/o. H. No. 8-2-7 4, Ali Colony, Old Bowenpally 3. Shaik Afroz, S/o Shaik Raheem Jahanglir, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Pvt service, Ri/o. H. No. 8-2-7 4, Ali Colony, Old Bowenpally 4. Shaik Elyas, S/o Shaik Raheem Jahangir, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Student Rl/o. H. No. 8-2-74, Ali Colony, Old Bowenpally ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1,3 TO 5 AND 1. THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANA, Rep. by SHO, PS Bowenpally, Through its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad 2. Merugu Rangaiah Goud, S/o Late Sattaiah Goud Aged64 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No.
8-5-95/1, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused 1,3 to 5 in CC. No. 661 oI 2021 pending on the file of the Xl Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Secunderabad in the interest of iustice and pass such other or further Order or Orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. l. A. NO: 'l OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC.
No 661 o'f 2021, on the file of the Xl Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Secunderabad, in the interest of justice and pass such other or further Order or Orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing t r,: Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing lle arguments of Sri IBAD UR REHMAN KHAN, Advocate for the Petitioners 'r rrl Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of tl r:'Respondent No. 'l and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER ! N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE oF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 492 ot 2o26 Date:21. 01. 2026 Between: Shaik Raheem Jahangir and three others Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by SHO, PS Bowenpally, Through its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and another ...
ResPondents ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 3 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C. C. No. 661 of 2021 on the file of learned Xl Additional Chief Judicial lvlagistrate at Secunderabad 2. Heard Mr. lbad Ur Rehman Khan, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No 1-State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners restricte I l. ,is arguments to the extent of dispensing with the presence 01 he petitioners before the trial court. 4. Learned Additional public prosecutor ha; submitted to pass appropriate orders. 5. Perused the record. 6.
However, in view of the submissions made I y, the learned counsel for the petitioners, the presence of the peti irners before the trial court is dispensed with provided I at they are l represented by a counsel before the trial court or :very clate of hearing and shall appear before the trial court r v l,enever their presence is required during the course of trial. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal petition is disposec rr.. Pending , misceraneous apprications, if an r sha, stand closed. sD/- S. tll q LLIKARJUNA RAO ASSIr i'rANT REGISTRAR -r' //TRUE COPY// \ FECTtoN oFFICER . i To, 1 The Xl Additionat Chief Judiciat Magistrate, Secunderat a l. 2 The Station House Officer PS Bowenpally, Secunderat e l. 3 Sri Merugu Rangaiah Go ud, S/o Late Saftaiah Goud Ag: Iti{ ys2rs, Occ. Business, RIo. H. No 8-5-95/1, Otd Bowen pally, Se; ,rrderabad 4. One CC to SRt. IBAD UR REHMAN KHAN Advocate rl ,UC] [( 5. Two CC to public Prosecutor, High Court for the State r,l 1-elangana, Hyderabad. [OUrl 6.
Two CD copies. bkz STB/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:21 101t2026 )lii 1|if ( l I I tt o I ,J 1I'\)f P : I ORDER * * (, t t1 CRLP. No. 492 ot 2026 il I I CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF J<s tl. t"G,
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.