Praveen Sharma v. P C Dhiman
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-01-01. Praveen Sharma v. P C Dhiman. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPCT NO. 109 of 2019 Decided on: 01. 01. 2020 Smt. Praveen Sharma . …Petitioner Versus P. C. Dhiman & another … Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No ______________ For the petitioner : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sumesh Raj, Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, J (Oral) By way of this Contempt Petition, petitioner alleges willful disobedience of the orders passed by the learned Tribunal in TA-494/15, titled as Smt. Praveen Sharma Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, dated 02. 03. 2016, which stood decided by the learned Tribunal in the following terms:- “2.
The applicant may file appropriate representation nd furnishing all factual details before the 2 respondent within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. nd 2 respondent/ competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within one month. The Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? applicant will produce a certified copy of this order while submitting the representation”. 2. A perusal of the reply filed by the respondents, demonstrates that pursuant to the order passed by the learned Tribunal and in abidance thereof the representation of the petitioner was decided by the respondent on 27. 12. 2016. As far as delay in disposing of the representation so filed by the petitioner is concerned, learned Additional Advocate General submits that he tender unconditional and unqualified apology for that on behalf of respondents, which is accepted. 3.
Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of and notices are ordered to be discharged, however, with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 27. 12. 2016, appended with the reply filed by the respondent as Annexure R-1, in accordance with law, if so advised. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge st 1 January, 2020 (Rishi)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.