ANITA KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND ANR
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-09-20. ANITA KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3102 of 2024 Decided on:20. 09. 2024 ____________________________________________________ Anita Kumari ……….. petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) The petitioner was appointed as a TGT (Non- Medical) on 07. 09. 2021. The aforesaid appointment of the petitioner was against the 3% quota meant for person with th disability as is evident from its order dated 7 September, 2021 appended alongwith the present petition as Annexure P-2. A perusal of the office order Annexure P-2 reflects that the appointment of the petitioner has been made on a contract basis. 2.
The petitioner contends in the writ petition that her initial appointment should have been on regular basis. In this respect, petitioner is seeking the benefits of law laid down by this Court in CWPOA No. 1077 of 2019, titled Nitin Kumar Vs. State of HP & anr. , decided on 22. 08. 2022, wherein it has been held Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? that a person appointed under the 3% quota meant for person with disability is to be appointed on a regular basis. 3. Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the benefits of the aforesaid judgment to other similar situate individuals have been granted by the respondents-State. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that w. r. t. the grievances being raised in the present petition, representation dated 09. 01. 2024 stands made to the concerned authorities. The same is appended with the present petition as Annexure P-4(Colly). 5.
Learned Deputy General submits that the representation so made by the petitioner, shall be decided within a period of four weeks from today. 6. In view thereof, present petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. List for compliance on 23. 10. 2024. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge September 20, 2024 tarun
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.