Skip to main content
LawSphereX

YUDHISTHIR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-11. YUDHISTHIR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7500 of 2024 1. Yudhisthir Mandal, S/o Nipen Mandal, R/o Village-Bhurundiha, PO & PS-Fatehpur, District-Jamtara 2. Neelam Devi @ Neelam Kumari, W/o Meghnath Mandal, R/o Village-Nawadih, PO & PS-Pahrol, District-Deoghar … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A. P. P. ----- 03/11. 12. 2024 The petitioners apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2)/115(2)/117(2)/123/ 109(2)/303(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F. I. R. So far as the petitioner no.

1 – Yudhisthir Mandal is concerned, it has been alleged against him that he threw the informant on the floor and thereafter he along with Meghnath Mandal and Sanjay Mandal assaulted and kicked him badly. So far as the petitioner no. 2 is concerned, it has been alleged that the informant asked her for water, however, she added poison in the same. The said allegation is completely false as the informant was discharged from the hospital after getting the basic treatment. The petitioners, however, undertake to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned A. P. P opposes the petitioners’ prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur, in connection with Pathrol P. S. Case No. 122/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) Manish A. B. A. No. 7500 of 2024

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.