EKRAM ALI @ IKRAM ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-10-13. EKRAM ALI @ IKRAM ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010130732020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. 1964/2020 1:EKRAM ALI @ IKRAM ALI S/O IDRISH ALI, R/O VILL-BHOGPUR, P. S. -GORESWAR, DIST-BAKSA, PIN- 781366 VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI ORDER Date : 13-10-2020 This application under Section 439 Cr. PC, has been filed praying for bail of the petitioner, namely, Sri Ekram Ali @ Ikram Ali, who is in detention in connection with Goreswar PS Case No. 109/2020 under Section 392 IPC. Heard Mr. Z. Alom, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P. P. for the respondent. Perused the copy of the FIR and the documents annexed with the petition and also the case diary produced today. Page No.
# 2/2 The accusation made in the FIR was that of committing robbery at about 7 O’clock in the evening. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has been in custody for 67 days. Having considered the nature of accusation made in the FIR and the length of detention, this court is of the view that further custodial detention of the petitioner may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to be enlarged on bail of Rs. 25,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Baksa, subject, of course, to the following conditions: 1. The accused petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation as and when required; 2. The accused petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts either to the Court or to any police officer. 3.
The accused petitioner shall not commit any similar offence, of which he is accused or suspected commission. Bail application is disposed of. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.