SHRI AGAPE H CHISHI v. SHRI VITOLU SEMA AND 8 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-04-24. SHRI AGAPE H CHISHI v. SHRI VITOLU SEMA AND 8 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020001862024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/52/2024 SHRI AGAPE H CHISHI THILIXU VILLAGE BLOCK-II, LANE IV HOUSE NO. 181 DIMAPUR NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI VITOLU SEMA AND 8 ORS S/O HENEZHE SEMA R/O SAOTIQA TOWN ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND 2:SHRI JEVITO ACHUMI S/O LATE YETOHE ACHUMI R/O B-KHEL KICHILIMI VILLAGE DIST. ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAND-798620 3:THE STATE OF NAGALAND REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY. NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF NPWD (ROADS AND BRIDGES) NAGALAND KOHIMA 6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (NH) KOHIMA NAGALAND 7:THE MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (MoRTH) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TRANSPORT BHAVAN Page No. # 2/3 1ST PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-110001 8:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
(NHIDCL) REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR 3RD FLOOR PTI BUILDING 4 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-110001 9:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PROJECTS) BHGIDCL NEAR NPWD COMPLEX KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : TAKA MASA, SR. ADV Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 24-04-2024 (P. J. Saikia, J) Heard the learned Sr. counsel Mr. Taka Masa assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel for the respondents/PIL petitioners. This application has been filed by the applicant pray-ing for impleading him as the respondent in the P. I. L 2/2024. Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that he has no objection if the applicant is impleaded as the respondent No. 8 in P. I. L 2/2024. Page No. # 3/3 We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.
Considering the narure of the case, the prayer of the applicant is allowed. The applicant shall be impleaded in P. I. L. 2/2024 as respondent No. 8. The I. A. stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.