BADRUN NISHA @ BADRUN NISA @ BADRU NISHA v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-08. BADRUN NISHA @ BADRUN NISA @ BADRU NISHA v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 13646 of 2025 1. Badrun Nisha @ …. Petitioners Badrun Nisa @ Badru Nisha 2. Sikander Allam @ Sikander Alam @ Seiko 3. Abdul Motalib Khan @ Abdul Motalif Khan @ Tiki Mr. L. Samantaray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. N. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 08. 12. 2025 Order No. 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G. R. Case No. 1955 of 2025 pending on the file of learned S. D. J. M. , Jagatsinghpur, arising out of Jagatsinghpur P. S. Case No. 912 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 109(1)/ 115(2)/ 121(1)/ 126(2)/ 132/ 143(3)/ 145/ 351(3)/ 61(2) of BNS. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that since Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are taken to custody, the ABLAPL in respect of said Petitioner has been rendered infructuous. 4.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL in respect of Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 stands disposed of as infructuous. 5. As such, the ABLAPL is confined to Petitioner No. 1. 6. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that taking into account the nature of allegation which are primarily against the co-accused who have since been taken to custody, Petitioner No. 1 may be protected by pre-arrest bail. 7. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during the currency of investigation and also submits that one of the injured is police personnel. Hence, no leniency ought to be shown. 8. Considering the nature of injury as borne out from the case dairy and the statements, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner No. 1 shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature. 9.
If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner No. 1 has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 10. It is needless to state that the Petitioner No. 1 shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 11. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 12. U. C. C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Dec-2025 13:41:55
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.