ROHIT VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. ROHIT VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10456/2026 CNR: RJHC010793342026 | URN: CRLMB / 22836U / 2026 Rohit Verma S/o Omprakash Verma, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village I Lnp, Karadwali, Police Station Jawaharnagar, District Sriganganagar. At Present Lodged In Central Jail Sriganganagar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Charan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 10/08/2026 This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 323/2026 registered at Police Station Jawaharnagar, District Sri Ganganagar, for offences under Sections 8/22 of the NDPS Act and Section 223(b) of BNS. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is 1.
20 gm Etizolam mouth dissolving Tablets 0. 5 mg and 4,000 capsules of Pregablin (which does not fall under the provisions of NDPS Act) which is below commercial quantity and antecedents of the petitioner are clear. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is behind the bars since 30. 07. 2026 and the trial of the case will take [2026:RJ-JP:38175] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10456/2026] sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. This Court has considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record. The contraband recovered from the petitioner is 1. 20 gm Etizolam mouth dissolving Tablets 0. 5 mg and 4,000 capsules of Pregablin (which does not fall under the provisions of NDPS Act) which is below commercial quantity and antecedents of the petitioner are clear. The petitioner is behind the bars since 30.
07. 2026. Hence, keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case; conclusion of the trial of the case is likely to take time; the narcotic contraband alleged to be recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity; the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rohit Verma S/o Omprakash Verma arrested in connection with FIR No. 323/2026 registered at Police Station Jawaharnagar, District Sri Ganganagar, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.
50,000/- each, to the [2026:RJ-JP:38175] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10456/2026] satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J 154/Mayank Chouhan
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.