Skip to main content
LawSphereX

PRAFULLA KUMAR ROUT v. RAMESH CHANDRA ROUTRAY

Court: High Court of Orissa

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-08. PRAFULLA KUMAR ROUT v. RAMESH CHANDRA ROUTRAY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 1113 of 2026 Prafulla Kumar Rout …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Biswaranjan Dalai, Adv. -versus- Ramesh Chandra …. Opposite Party(s) Routray Mr. Debashish Nayak, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 01. 08. 04. 2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner has filed this CRLMC assailing the order of NBW dated 25. 10. 2025 issued by the learned Civil Judge-cum-J. M. F. C, Rourkela in 1CC Case No. 408 of 2015, against him. 3. Heard. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has been on bail since long. He was regularly attending the court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 25. 10. 2025, the Petitioner could not remain present in court due to noncommunication by the conducting Counsel. Hence, the learned Court in seisin over the matter issued the order of N. B. W. against him.

He further submits that the Petitioner undertakes to cooperate till the end of the trial and appear before the learned court below on each date of posting of the case without fail. 5. In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the present CRLMC. Accordingly, the order of N. B. W issued to the Petitioner on 25. 10. 2025 by the learned Court below in the aforesaid case is, hereby, quashed. 6. The Petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the said court shall release him on bail with some stringent conditions. In addition, the Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 1000/- (rupees one thousand only) as cost for violating the court’s order, in favour of the Rourkela Bar Association, Rourkela.

The said amount shall be utilized for the purpose of purchasing of books in the Bar Library. Receipt showing deposit of the cost shall be presented before the learned court in seisin over the matter. 7. Accordingly, this CRLMC is disposed of. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta

Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.