ROOPNARAYAN PATHAK v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. ROOPNARAYAN PATHAK v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1886 of 2024 BETWEEN:- 1. ROOPNARAYAN PATHAK S/O SHRI JHALLOO PRASAD PATHAK, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SECTION WRITER WARD NO. 15 RAJNAGAR DISTRICT CHHATARPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. GEETA MISHRA W/O SHRI RAMSWAROOP MISHRA OCCUPATION: SECTION WRITER ADDRESS KHAJURAHO DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SATISH KUMAR PANDEY S/O HARICHARAN PANDEY OCCUPATION: SECTION WRITER ADDRESS WARD NO. 8 DHAWAD DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI PRANAY SHUKLA - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT. VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. THE COLLECTOR C H H ATA R P U R OFFICE CHHATARPUR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.
SWATI ASEEM GEORGE - DEPUTY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Petitioners' contention is that petitioners are working as Section Writers, Signature Not Verified Signed by: MOHD TABISH Signing time: 03-02-2024 11:40:17 they are seeking benefit of GAD circular dated 07. 10. 2016. Accordingly, this petition can be disposed of without commending on the merits with a direction that if the petitioners prefer a fresh representation before respondent No. 2 within a period of fifteen days from today alongwith certified copy of this order, then the same shall be considered and decided by respondents No. 2, through a speaking order, strictly in terms of the GAD circular dated 07. 10. 2016 and also taking into consideration a fact that as to whether the engagement of the petitioners was continuous one or was with a broken period. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
In above terms, this petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE MTK Signature Not Verified Signed by: MOHD TABISH Signing time: 03-02-2024 11:40:17
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.