KAMLESH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-07. KAMLESH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
(1 of 3) [CW-6252/2020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6252/2020 Rajendra Singh Shekhawat D/o Shri Prabhu Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 12, Amit Colony Jaipur Road, Bikaner, Dist. Bikaner (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer. 3. District Collector (Land Revenue), Pali. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18379/2019 Prabhu Dan Charan S/o Anna Dan Charan, Aged About 44 Years, Village Deshnok, Tehsil And Dist Bikaner (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer. 3. District Collector (Land Revenue), Jaisalmer. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.
18405/2019 Kamlesh Chauhan D/o Shri Dinesh Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of In Front Of Shiv Temple, Shiv Colony, Pisangan, Dist. - Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer. 3. District Collector (Land Revenue), Pali. ----Respondents (2 of 3) [CW-6252/2020] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pappu Sangwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mrigraj Singh } both through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 07/12/2020 1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition for the following reliefs :- (a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to pay salary/stipend to the petitioner for the period 02. 08. 2018 to 04. 10. 2018 with interest @ 9% per annum. The respondents may kindly be directed to refund the amount of Rs. 2534/- deposited by the petitioner.
(b) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (c) Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs. 2. Mr. Mrigraj Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent- State, submits that State Government has taken an in-principle decision to pay the bond amount to the candidates who have been selected on other posts. He invited Court’s attention towards the communication dated 05. 02. 2020 (Annex. R/1 in SBCWP No. 18379/2019 - Prabhu Dan Charan Vs. State & Ors. ). 3. A perusal of order dated 05. 02. 2020 referred above shows that vide order dated 14. 02. 2019, the Board of Revenue has (3 of 3) [CW-6252/2020] decided to refund the bond amount. Requisite amount has been paid to the petitioner in writ petition No. 18379/2019. 4.
In view of the aforesaid stand of the State, these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents to pay the bond amount to the petitioners (if not already paid) and other legitimate dues within a period of three months from today. 5. If any of the petitioners’ grievance persists, he/they will be free to take up appropriate proceedings, including revival of the writ petition. 6. Stay petitions also stand disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 5-7-Amar/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.