Skip to main content
LawSphereX

G.Kurmaiah Goud v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-17. G.Kurmaiah Goud v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

t 32ss l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 2257 OF 2019 Between: G. Kurmaiah Goud, S/o G. Sandanna Goud, Aged about 87 years, Occ: toddy tapper Rio H. No. 'l -45, Bandameedipally village, Mahabubnagar Town and District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, At Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Telangana State, Abkari Bhavan, At Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Mahabubnagar district, at Mahabubnagar Town and district. 4. The District Prohibition and Excise Officer, Functional Registrar, Mahabubnagar district, At Mahabubnagar town and district. 5.

The Station House Officer/Prohibition and Excise lnspector, At Mahabubnagar Town and District. 6. Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society, Mahabubnagar town and district, Represented by its President, At Mahabubnagar town and district. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, or Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS by declaring the orders of the 1st and 2nd respondents herein passed vide Memo No. 4223lEx. ll(2)12-18-1, dated 24-02-2018 and Lr. No. 671/2018lCPDlE2, dated 07-05-2018 respectively as bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, besides offending Article 19 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside by restoring the order of the 4th respcr lent passed vide Rc. No. A7l1 24912000, dated 1 6-02-201 8.

lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr y be pleased to stay the orders of the 1st and 2nd respondents herein rassed vide [\4emo No. 4223lEx1 1(2)12-18-1, dated 24-02-2018 and Lr. No. 671 t>01glCPDlE2, dated 07-05-2018 respectively by restoring the order of the 4th res rondent passed vide Rc. No. A7l1249/2000, dated 16-02-2018, during the pendir( disposal of present Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Between: Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society, Mahabubnagar town anc distrrct, Represented by its President, At tt4ahabubnagar town and district, Sri G. Sn'r vasulu Goud. ... VACATE STAY PETITIONI: I/6TH RESPONDENT AND 1. G. Kurmaiah Goud, S/o G. Sandanna Goud, Aged about 37 years, Occ: toddy tapper R/o H. No. '1-45, Bandameedipally village, tr,4ahr :ubnagar Town and District. ,. WRIT PETITIONER 2.

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal iecretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, At Telangana Secretarrat. Hydr: abad. 3. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Tel;r gana State, Abkari Bhavan, At Nampally, Hyderabad. 4- The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, l/ rhabubnagar drstrict, at lVahabubnagar Town and district. : 5. The District Prohibition and Excise Offlcer rnctional Registrar, jno IVahabuonJgar oisiriCt, At ltlarraouonagarlown itirt- )t. 6. The Station House Officer/Prohibition and Excise lnsper)1 ;r, At Mahabubnagar Town and District. ... RESPONDEt TS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the lnterim Order dated 21 . 02. 2019 made in l. A. No. 1 of 2019 and to dismiss the W. P. No. 2257 of 2019. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVAS KAPATIA Counsel for the Respondents No.

1 to 5: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: SRI M. V. V. BASWARAJ The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI. , INGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRA\ AN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 2257 of 2OL9 DATE OF ORDER: L7. L2. 2O25 Between: Sri. C. Kurmaiah Goud. . , Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretar5r Prohibition and Excise Departr tent At Telangala Secretariat Hyderabad and five other ;. . . . I espondents ORDER Today when the matter has been taken up lor hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that d: : to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not surv \ e for further adj udicatiorr 2. In view of the submission made by the leer-l ned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is cli smissed as infructuous 3. Miscellaneous applications, if any pendinp,, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. SDr-'.

PONNA KRISHNA AS(i STANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// \. / SECTION OFFICER To '1 . One CC to SRI SRINIVAS KAPATIA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High C: rrt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI M. V. V. BASWARAJ, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies MP vk / BS l HIGH COURT DAT'IiD:1711212025 i;; n " (C \ \ J o ) q 2 2 0E[ 21 )t, ORDER WP. N('. 2257 of 2019 DISMISSING THE \^I RIT PETITION AS IN FRUCTUOUS WIT{OUT COSTS L a' T\'-\2r-d

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.