Smt. Madhurima Bhattacharjee v. Sri Ramendra Kishore Bhattacharjee
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-04-24. Smt. Madhurima Bhattacharjee v. Sri Ramendra Kishore Bhattacharjee. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
( 2026:THC:520-DB ) HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont. Cas(C) 59 of 2025 Smt. Madhurima Bhattacharjee, daughter of late Gopal Bhattacharjee, C/o Shri Tapan Bhattacharjee resident of Ramnagar Road No. 3, (Near Sishu Mahal School), P. S. West Agartala, District- West Tripura …….. Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Ramendra Kishore Bhattacharjee, son of late Shanti Gopal Bhattacharjee, resident of Badharghat, Sreepalli, Near Nabajagaran Sangha, P. S. Amtali, District- West Tripura ………. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vandana Sinha, Advocate Mr. Kundan Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate Mr. Kawsik Nath, Advocate Ms. Sutapa Deb Barman, Advocate Mr. Dipjyoti Paul, Advocate Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Advocate HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT ORDER 24. 04.
2026 [1] This present petition is filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for drawing up proceeding against respondent for disobedience of the Judgment and Order (Oral) dated 08. 04. 2025 passed by this Court in MAT. App. No. 15 of 2024. [2] When the case is called, Mr. K. Pandey, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent. It is represented by both the sides that in compliance of order of this Court dated 05. 12. 2025 passed in Cont. Cas(C) No. 59 of 2025, the balance amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- has already been paid to the petitioner wife by the respondent husband. [3] In view of the above submission made at the Bar, this Court is of the view that there survives nothing for adjudication in the present contempt case and thus, the same stands closed. Biswajit Palit, J. Dr. T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Sabyasachi. G.
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.