PHURITSHABAM CHAOBA DEVI AND 4 ORS v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANR
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-09-25. PHURITSHABAM CHAOBA DEVI AND 4 ORS v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Digitally signed by JOHN JOHN TELEN TELEN KOM Date: 2024. 09. 26 10:11:38 KOM +05'30' Item No. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C)No. 676 of 2024 Phuritshabam Chaoba Devi & 4 Ors. …Petitioners - Versus- State of Manipur & Anr. …Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 25. 09. 2024. [1] Heard Ms. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. [2] The petitioner who are the Assistant Government Advocate-cum-Assistant Public Prosecutor(District) and also the member of the Assistant Government Advocates cum Assistant Public Prosecutor(District) Association, Manipur submitted a representation dated 14. 08. 2019 to the Principal Secretary(Finance), Government of Manipur for upgrading their pay scales as their pay scales have been downgraded in the Manipur Services(Revised Pay) Rules, 1999. [3] It is submitted that the petitioners have also submitted another representation dated 18. 12.
2019 to the Secretary(Law), Government of Manipur and it is still pending with the authority. [4] It is submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 14. 08. 2019 within a stipulated period of time. [5] Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA submitted that the said representation dated 14. 08. 2019 is 5(five) years old and might have been disposed of now. However, he has no objection in passing innocuous order by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 14. 08. 2019 submitted by the petitioners. [6] Recording the submissions made at bar, writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 14. 08. 2019 by a speaking order within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the same has not been disposed of earlier. [7] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.
[8] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties. JUDGE John Kom
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.