/12489/2024 of VIKRAMA JEET VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. MINOR IRRIGATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: ALOK MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2024-12-20. /12489/2024 of VIKRAMA JEET VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. MINOR IRRIGATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS....
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:86055 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12489 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vikrama Jeet Verma Respondent :- State Of U. P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Minor Irrigation Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash,Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has sought writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the benefit of first and second ACP on completion of 10 years and 16 years of service and also to issue no dues certificate for the period from 31. 01. 2000 to 31. 08. 2020 and certificate of disciplinary proceedings when the petitioner was posted as Junior Minor Irrigation in District - Ambedkar Nagar. Further prayer has been made seeking direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide his representation dated 25. 11.
2024, annexed as Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that initially petitioner was appointed on the post of Junior Minor Irrigation on 13. 01. 2000. It seems that while petitioner was posted in Block Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar some disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him and order dated 20. 05. 2010 was passed against him. Petitioner challenged the said order before this Court in Writ Petition No. 3392 9M/S) of 2010, which was allowed by this Court by means of order dated 23. 10. 2019, the said writ petition was allowed and impugned order was quashed directing the District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar to take decision. The inquiry proceedings continued against the petitioner and due to which first and second ACP were not granted to the petitioner. In this regard petitioner has given several representations before the authority concerned, but till no decision has been taken. 4.
After arguing the matter up to some length, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no. 2 - Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, U. P. Lucknow is directed to consider and decide his representation dated 25. 11. 2024, annexed as Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition, expeditiously. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide petitioner's representation. 6. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 -Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, U. P. Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 25. 11. 2024, annexed as Annexure No.
9 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, by means of reasoned ans speaking order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 20. 12. 2024 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J. ) Digitally signed by :-Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMAANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow BenchLucknow Bench
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.