H V GANAPATHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2020-12-22. H V GANAPATHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ND DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P. S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 318/2020 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: 1 . H V GANAPATHI S/O VENKATAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O HULEGARU, KHANDIKA POST SAGARA TALUK-577 401 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 2 . MANJUNATHA K N S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O GUDDEDHIMBA KHANDIKA POST SAGARA TALUK-577 401 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION M S BUILDING DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-01 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - 2 - 2 . JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BENGALURU DIVISION NO. 18, CHAMARAJAPETE BENGALURU-560 018 3 . DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577201 4 . ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SAGAR SUB DIVISION SAGAR-577 401 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 5 .
THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY RD 3 FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 6 . PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA KHANDIKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KHANDIKA, SAGARA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A R, AGA FOR R. 1 TO 4; SRI. G. V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R. 5; R. 6- SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 20(2) (a-iv) - 3 - AND (a-v) OF THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959 IS ULTRA VIRES THE LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE AND ARTICLES 243 Z1 AND 243-ZO OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard Shri. S. V. Prakash, learned advocate for the petitioners. 2. Shri. S. V. Prakash, learned advocate submits that the petitioners have lost the election and do not wish to prosecute the petition.
In view of the submission of Shri. Prakash, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE NBM
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.