NIRMAL KUMAR v. SHRI KANA RAM
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-09-25. NIRMAL KUMAR v. SHRI KANA RAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:39979] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Writ Contempt No. 49/2024 1. Nirmal Kumar S/o Shri Himat Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Vagawas, Post Jaitu, Tehsil Bagora, District Jalore, Rajasthan. 2. Mohan Lal Jat S/o Shri Karana Ram Jat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Vpo- Khara, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore, Rajasthan. 3. Rajesh Acharya S/o Shri Ladu Lal Acharya, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Near Nath Kui, Banera, Tehsil Baneda, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 4. Tshayp Singh S/o Shri Omprakash Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Kani (Tigaon) Post Jonal, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 5. Mahesh Vaishnav S/o Shri Ramswaroop Vaishnav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 3 Krishna Colony, Sushilpura, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Pooja Nawaria D/o Shri Mahesh Nawaria, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 1/413, Adarsh Colony, Maan Club, Dausa, Rajasthan. 7.
Prem Singh Meena S/o Shri Raghuveer Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Haldina, Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 8. Mamta Ved D/o Shri Ram Prasad Ved, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo- Badiyal Kalan, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 9. Rukma D/o Shri Bodu Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dhani Lalodha, Vpo Papurna Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 10. Bibi Shakerin D/o Shri Mohammad Sayeedur Rahman Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kazi Colony, Ward No. 4 Shahpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Shanker Lal S/o Shri Prabhu Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Sariyana, Post Fagotra, Tehsil Bhinmal, District Jalore, Rajasthan. 12. Nirmal Dewasi S/o Shri Narana Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Pal, Post Kuda, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore, Rajasthan. [2024:RJ-JD:39979] (2 of 2) [WCP-49/2024] ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Kana Ram, The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 2.
Shri Harji Lal Atal, The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. L. Deora. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. S. Pidiyar for Mr. S. S. Ladrecha, AAG. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/09/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with, therefore, nothing survives in the contempt petition. However, he seeks liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. The rule issued is discharged. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 502-AnilSingh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.