PALINDAR KUMAR BHOGTA @ AJIT JEE @ PALINDAR GANJHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-04. PALINDAR KUMAR BHOGTA @ AJIT JEE @ PALINDAR GANJHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
(2026:JHHC:13153) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3732 of 2026 ------ Palindar Kumar Bhogta @ Ajit Jee @ Palindar Ganjhu, aged about 34 years, S/o Late Darsu Bhogta, R/o Vill- Lacchipur (Dokar), P. O. & P. S. Balumath, District- Latehar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu Prabahakr Pathak, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, A. P. P ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 04-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chandwa P. S. Case No. 159 of 2021 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 121 of 2026 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 353 of the I. P. C. , under Section 25(1-A), 26(2), 35 of the Arms Act and under Section 17 of the CLA Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly of the members of the banned extremist JJMP Organization and attempted to murder of police personnel by opening fire upon them and during the firing, the extremists were taking name of each other; on the basis of which the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01. 05. 2026 in B. A. No. 3377 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06. 01.
2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Adll. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A. C. J. M. , Latehar in Chandwa P. S. Case No. 159 of 2021 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 121 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
) 04/05/2026 Amar/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.