Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MODA RAM v. STATE AND ORS.

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-08. MODA RAM v. STATE AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 640/2013 Moda Ram S/o Ashu Ram , by caste Tanwar (Mali), resident of Behind Chopra Katla, Rani Bazar, Bikaner (Raj. ) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan. 2. Giriraj S/o Chand ratan, by caste Maheshwari, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) 3. Smt. Kanchan Devi W/o Brijmohan, by caste maheshwari, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) 4. Smt. Manju devi D/o Suraj ratan, by caste Maheshwari, resident of Mohata Chowk, Bikaner (Raj. ) 5. Smt. Kamla Devi D/o Khinvraj, by caste Maheshwari, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) 6. Prem Ratan S/o Dau Lal, by caste Bagdi, resident of Teliwara, Bikaner (Raj. ) 7. Smt. Karun w/o Sudarshan, by caste Bagdi, resident of Teliwara, Bikaner (Raj. ) 8. Rajkumari D/o Chand Ratan, by caste Maheshwari, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) 9. Smt.

Saroj Devi w/o Shiv ratan, by caste Maheshwari, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) Proforma Respondents: 10. Manmohan S/o Chand Ratan, by caste Chandak, resident of ourside Jasasur Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) 11. Jagdish narayan S/o Laxmi Narayan, by caste Purohit, resident of outside Jasusar Gate, Bikaner (Raj. ) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Jain, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, G. A-cum-A. A. G. , with Mr. Anda Ram Choudhary, P. P. Mr. H. S. Shrimali, through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Order 08/12/2020 (2 of 2) [CRLMP-640/2013] Learned counsel Mr. Vineet Jain submits that the petitioner has passed away, but his LRs are contesting the matter before the Executive Magistrate. Thus, he prays that the Executive Magistrate may be directed to decide the proceedings under Section 145 CrPC expeditiously.

In view of the above statement, the learned Executive Magistrate is directed to expedite the proceedings under Section 145 CrPC and try to decide and conclude the same preferably within a period of one and half years from the date of receipt of this order. With the above direction, the instant criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 11-Pramod/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.