LOKESH KARWASRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. LOKESH KARWASRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38117] (1 of 2) [CW-18675/2026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18675/2026 CNR: RJHC010796522026 | URN: CW / 32262U / 2026 Lokesh Karwasra S/o Shri Hari Ram Karwasra, Aged About 27 Years, Rsident Of Mirdha Colony, Kachras, Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Animal Husbandry Jaipur. 2. The Direcotr, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Pooja Choudhary, Livestock Inspector Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rakhi Choudhary, Dy. G. C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is serving on the post of Livestock Inspector, which is a low-paid post, however, the respondents vide order dated 10. 07. 2026 (Annex.
1) have transferred the petitioner from Sub-Centre, Paladi Jodha (Mundwa), District Nagaur to Gabbu Kha Chowk, Jodhpur which is approximately 200 Kms. away from the present place of posting. Learned counsel petitioner make a limited prayer that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously and, in the meantime, grant the petitioner limited interim protection. [2026:RJ-JP:38117] (2 of 2) [CW-18675/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that though the petitioner is a low paid employee, however, on account of administrative exigency the respondents have transferred the petitioner vide order dated 10. 07. 2026. 3.
In view of the submissions made and taking into consideration the factual position, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of ‘7 days’ from today raising all grounds and the respondents-Authorities are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of ‘15 days’ from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 10. 07. 2026 (Annex. 1) qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents, if the petitioner has not joined at the new place of posting. 5.
With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not file representation within a period of 7 days from today, the interim order granted by this Court shall vacate automatically. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 118/Sombeer Singh
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.