M/s. Vishnu Constructions v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-29. M/s. Vishnu Constructions v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
34el I [ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO:487 OF 2026 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent Preferred against the orders dated 18-03-2026 in W. P. No. 8215 of 2026 on the file of the High Court. Between: M/s. Vishnu Constructions, Having its office at 8-46-8i53 North Balaji Hills Colony, Boduppal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Represented by its sole Proprietor Sri. Nagesh Kavali, S/o K. llaiah. ... APPELLANT/ WRIT PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Dr. B. R Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3.
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Zonal Commissioner, LB Nagar Zone, Hyderabad. 4. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. 1, Kapra, GHMC, Hyderabad. 5. The District Collector and Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 6. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, lnformation Technology, Electronics and Communications Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad ... RESPONDENTS ry l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to desist from causing hindrance/preventing the petitioner from erecting/installing the Telecommunication Tower at Plot No. 75, situated in Sy. No. 52 and 53, Yellareddyguda, Kapra, Medchal-Malkajgiri District by suspending the '10. 9. 2025 impugned show-cause Notice No.
326lUCl2O25, dated in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P. SHASHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Ms. JAYASREE, AGP FOR GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 TO 4: SRI P. SRINIVAS RAO, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: GP FOR INFORMAT|ON AND TECHNOLOGY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 487 OF 2()26 DATE:. 29. o4. 2026 Betwee n: M/s. Vishnu Constructions A ppe IIant And 'l'he StaLe o[ 1'e langana, Rcp. b1 its Principal Sccretary, Municipal Adm ir-r is tration and Urban [)cvck. rpmcnt Dcpartment, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Sccretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others. Respondents lvlr. ['.
Shashr Kiran, learned counscl appcaring loI thc appellant Ms Jayasrcc, the lcarned Assistant Government Pleader represr:nunB thc learncd Covernmenr Plcader lor Municipal Adminislration and Urban Development appearing {br the rcspondent No. L Mr P Srrnrvas Rao, the lcarned Standinll Oounsel fol GHMC arppearing for the rcspondcnt Nos 2 to . 1 'lhc lcarncd Gover-nmcnL Pleadcr lbr InformaLron arlcl Tc(hnoloK\ lor the "ppr:aring rcspondcnt No. 6 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumr Bhattacha4'a) I The Writ Appeal has bccn filcd assailing an order dated 18. 03. 2026 passed by a learncd Srnglc . Iudgc o[ this Court in W. P. No. 82 15 ol'2O26. 2. l'ltc appcllant,/rr t. rt pcritioner liled thc Writ petition scckrng a u rit of nt. rrrdamus declaring [hc action of thc authoritres of thc respondcnt No. 4/Greatcr H,r,derabad Munrcrpal Corporatron ((]llMC) in prevcnting the appellant from 'lc e rectinLr :r l(. c()m m Lrn rr. zr Lion 'lo$'er plot at I\o. 75, situated in Survt,r Nos.
52 and i;3, yellareddvguda, Kapra, Mcdchal Malkajgiri Drsrrrct, unrlcr the guise o[ a Show Causc Noticc dated IO. OC) 2025, dcsprrc thc submission of dctailed replies datcd l2. OC). -? 025 :rn<l 29. 0t,r. 2025 and a l.. r rntimatton of c()mmcncclnenr of uork datcd O9. lO. )O25, as illcgal and a rbitr:r n' 'l'lrr. 3- Icrirncrl Sirrglr' .. tt. rclgc disposcd of the Writ pctition bv clircclrng tltc rt:sponclcnl authoriLies/(illMC to considcr thc appellirnt's rclrlir:s darcrl 12. O9. 2C25 and 29. O9. 2025 The rcspoll(l('nt :lritlr()riLi(,s rvcrc trlso dirccted to give a fair opporlunltv ol ltearinq to all the concerned partics, pass appropri:ttc orclers in accordancc with [aw, and communicate the santc to the appellanl. 4. Wc arc unable lo understaltd as to l,row thc appellant can be aggricved i;. ,, th<: clircctior-rs issued b}, the Iearned Single Judge in the impugned ordcr. 5. Lt::rrnt'd r. t)unscl ;rppcarinr{ lor thc appellarrI submrts that the impr-rgncd dircctror. r.
locs nor lix a timc framc withrn rvhich I J Y [he respondcnt zruthorities/ GHMC shall consider the replies and pass a reasoned order 6. Thc lcarncd Star-rding Counscl for Gt IMtl appe aring for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 submits that the respondent authorities/GHMC witl consider the appellant's replies dated 12. 09. 2025 and 29. O9. 2025 and pass a rcasoned order u'ithin thre e u'ccks frorn tomorrow i. e. , 30. O4. 2026- 7. W. A. No. 487 o[ 2026, along with all connected applications, is ar:cordingly disposed of dir<rcting the respondent authorities/(itlMC to consider thc erppcllant's rcplies dated 12. 09. 2025 antl 29. O9. 2025 and pass a reasoncd order n,rthin threc u'ccks from tomorrow i. e-, 30,04. 2026. Needless to say, the respondent aut horiries/ GI-{ M C shtrll ctrntmunicalc its decision to thc irppcllant within two days ol taking such 'l'herc decision. shall bc no order as to costs. SD/- V. HARI PRASAD OEPUTY REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To 1 .
The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, LB Nagar Zone, Hyderabad. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No. '1, Kapra, GHMC, Hyderabad. 5. The District Collector and Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 6. The Principal Secretary, lnformation Technology, Eleckonics and Communications Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. -'-: I:a1 A -"- :qq*=u- -I- T 7. One CC to SRI P. SHASHI KIRAN, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 10.
Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 1l One CC to SRI P. SRINIVAS RAO, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] 12. Two CD Copies PSK PSK M/ CC TODAY HIGH COURT I DATED: 2910412026 I f I ']-,r -r: a. r! ,4r', ji' la l1 'r' -,-). , :. ,1. 5 '. ) ii ii? zs APB ?!? fi ::: l! ':-i/ \.. \' -t' '. : ' '-. l\' -t -:i\, J. JUDGMENT WA. No. 487 of 2O26 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WTHOUT COSTS 11, ? )
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.