M CHANDRAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R DEVDAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-02-26. M CHANDRAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 19882 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19882 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. M CHANDRAPPA SON OF LATE MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST RESIDENT OF SEETHARAMPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. 2. GANGADHARA SON OF KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE RESIDENT OF SEETHARAMPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK Digitally signed by SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. SHARADAVANI B 3. SHIVAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF SON OF RAJANNA N, KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE RESIDENT OF SEETHARAMPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. 4. SMT. PARVATHAMMA DAUGHTER OF SHIVRUDRAPPA, - 2 - WP No. 19882 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE RESIDENT OF SEETHARAMPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M. S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, TALLUKA UNAUTHORISED CULTIVATION,REGULARISATION COMMITTEE,BAHDRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 201. 3. THE TAHASILDAR BHADRAVATHI TALLUKI - TALLUK,BHADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K P YOGANNA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATIONS/ REPRESENTATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND REGULARIZE THEIR RESPECTIVE LANDS UNDER UNAUTHORISED CULTIVATION AT ANNEXURE-C-1 TO C-3 AND ANNEXURE-D AS PER THE REQUESTS OF THE PETITIONERS - 3 - WP No. 19882 of 2025 AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTIONS WHICH THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 12. 02. 2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, list this matter on 26. 02. 2026 for dismissal. " 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE SSD List No. : 2 Sl No. : 11
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.