SRI. M. S. SUBBEGOWDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD,T.M.NADAF
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-11. SRI. M. S. SUBBEGOWDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 35300 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. M. NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 35300 OF 2024 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI. M. S. SUBBEGOWDA S/O. LATE SHESHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, DESIGNATION RETIRED SUPERINTENDENT IN GOVERNMENT BOYS HOSTEL DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, R/AT OLD MUDIGERE, Digitally MUDIGERE TALUK, Signed by REKHA R CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT, Location : PIN CODE-577 550. High Court of Karnataka …PETITIONER (BY SMT. HEMALATHA B V. ,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, - 2 - WP No. 35300 of 2024 VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE UNDER SECRETARY - 1 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE ACCOUNT GENERAL (A AND E) GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NO. 5329, PARK HOUSE ROAD, CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 4.
THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVAREDDY. , AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE KAT DATED 31. 08. 2023 IN A. No-3374/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-E; ii) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 01. 07. 2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. - 3 - WP No. 35300 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. M. NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) None appears for the petitioner, and the office objections remain unattended to despite opportunity granted by this Court on 10. 11. 2025.
This Court can only infer that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition as the office objections are unattended to over a period of one year despite opportunities. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for default. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (T. M. NADAF) JUDGE AN/-
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.