Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MD.MAHBOOB MANSURI ALIAS MD.MAHBOOD MANSOORI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-11-27. MD.MAHBOOB MANSURI ALIAS MD.MAHBOOD MANSOORI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:35412 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10282 of 2025 ------ Md. Mahboob Mansuri @ Md. Mahbood Mansoori, aged about 28 years, S/o. Md. Abdul Sattar, R/o. Vill. - Baghakol, P. O. & P. S. - Basantrai, Dist. Godda. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, A. P. P. ------ 02/27. 11. 2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S. T. Case No. 290/2023 arising out of Basantrai P. S. Case No. 40 of 2023, for the offences registered under Sections 364, 506 & 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added, subsequently cognizance has been taken under Sections 364, 506, 302, 201 & 120B/34 of the I. P. C. , pending in the court of learned District and Sessions Judge-IV, Godda. 3. On 08. 06.

2023, husband of the informant namely Md. Naziruddin had gone to Bhagalpur alongwith his driver by his car bearing registration No. JH17J-1175. Subsequently, the husband of the informant was abducted and his dead body was recovered from a place near railway track, Jiyajori. Suspicion has been raised upon the named accused persons that they might have committed the murder of the deceased. During the course of investigation, driver of the vehicle was found involved in the occurrence and confessed his guilt that he alongwith co-accused Sakir, Md. Saba, Md. Irfan and this petitioner had committed murder of the deceased. He also confessed that his family members were also involved in the occurrence. 4. It was submitted that apart from his confession there is no material available against the petitioner on record. It was further submitted that several co-accused persons have been granted bail earlier by this Court as well as different co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 5.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions Judge-IV, Godda in connection with S. T. Case No. 290/2023 arising out of Basantrai P. S. Case No. 40 of 2023. 27 November 2025 (Ambuj Nath, J. ) Rahul/-

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.