RAKHI TIWARI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-03-14. RAKHI TIWARI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANJULI PALO th ON THE 26 OF APRIL, 2023 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 32249 of 2018 BETWEEN:- 1. RAKHI TIWARI D/O SHRI KAILASH TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O GRAM CHHINDLI POST BIJOURA TEH. DEORI P. S. MAHARAJPUR SAGAR DISTT. SAGAR M. P. , PRESENTLY R/O GHAMAPUR CHOWK KARAMCHAND SQUARE P. S. BELBAGH DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RAKESH TIWARI S/O SHRI KAILASH TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O MAHARAJPUR DISTT. SAGAR PRESENTLY GHAMAPUR CHOWK PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SOMESH TIWARI @ SUMIT S/O SHRI KAILASH TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O MAHARAJPUR DISTT. SAGAR PRESENTLY GHAMAPUR CHOWK PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SANJU @ SANJAY SONKAR S/O SHRI KESHAV PRASAD SONKAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BHAN TALAIYA PREM SAGAR ROAD PS BELBAGH, R/O BHAN TALAIYA PREM SAGAR ROAD PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. SMT.
NIDHI TIWARI W/O SHRI SOMESH TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O GRAM CHHINDLI PS MAHARAJPUR DITT. SAGAR PRESENTLY BAIL KA BAGICHA 1ST GALI, GHAMAPUR, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANTS (NONE) Signature Not Verified SAN AND Digitally signed by NITESH PANDEY Date: 2023. 04. 27 16:59:18 IST 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION BELBAGH JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SMT. SAVITA BAGDI W/O SHRI RAJARAM BAGDI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, INFRONT OF BADI KHERMAI, H. NO. 509, PS HANUMANTAL, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY MS. MAMTA MISHRA - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE STATE) This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This petition is pending since 2018. Today, no one is present on behalf of the applicants. On last date of hearing i. e. 19. 11. 2019, none has appeared on behalf of applicants. Since no one is present to prosecute the petition, hence, this M. Cr. C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SMT.
ANJULI PALO) JUDGE Nitesh Signature Not VerifiedSignature Not Verified SANSAN Digitally signed by NITESH PANDEYDigitally signed by NITESH PANDEY Date: 2023. 04. 27 16:59:18 ISTDate: 2023. 04. 27 16:59:18 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.