RAJDEEP DAS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-09. RAJDEEP DAS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010181662020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/2163/2020 RAJDEEP DAS S/O- DR NIRMAL KUMAR DAS, PERMANENT R/O- JAGANNATH MANDIR ROAD, P. O- NAGAON, P. S- NAGAON SADAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782001, PRESENT R/O- 660 KING STREET, APARTMENT 261, SAN- FRANCISCO- 94107, USA REP. BY HIS FATHER NAMELY DR NIRMAL KUMAR DAS, S/O- LATE NARENDRA CHANDRA DAS, R/O- JAGANNATH MANDIR ROAD, P. O- NAGAON, P. S- NAGAON SADAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782001 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REP.
BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA, DEPTT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MIN OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, WEST BLOCK- 1, WING- 6, 2ND FLOOR, R K PURAM, NEW DELHI- 110066 2:THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA DEPTT OF HIGHER EDUCATION MIN OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT WEST BLOCK-1 WING-6 2ND FLOOR R K PURAM NEW DELHI- 110066 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MIN OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS CPV DIVISION NEW DELHI 4:THE SECRETARY Page No. # 2/3 TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MIN OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE 156-A WING NIRMAN BHAVAN NEW DELHI 5:THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL BOG-MCI POCKET-14 SECTOR-8 DWARAKA PHASE I NEW DELHI- 110077 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A D CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT. S. G. I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER Date : 09-12-2020 Heard Mr. S. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant. By this I. A.
, the applicant has brought to the notice of the Court certain corrections which are required to be made in the Judgment and Order dated 07. 12. 2020 passed in WP(C) No. 574/2020. Mr. H. Gupta, learned counsel appears for the opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 and Mr. D. K. Baidya, learned counsel appears for the opposite party No. 5. Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties and upon perusal of the pleadings, it is directed that this order shall be read as a part of the Judgment and Order dated 07. 12. 2020 passed in WP(C) No. 574/2020 in terms of the following:- 1. In Paragraph No. 2 the word “Post Operate Research Scholar” should be read as “Post Doctoral Research Scholar”. 2. In Paragraph Nos. 3 the word “G-1 Visa” should be read as “J-1 Visa”. Page No. # 3/3 3. In paragraph No. 6, the word “Kathmandu Medical College” should be read as “Kathmandu University”. 4. In paragraph No.
17, the word “(which was affiliated to the Kathmandu Medical College under Kathmandu University)” should be read as “(which was affiliated to Kathmandu University)”. The I. A. is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of. This order shall be a part of the judgment and order dated 07. 12. 2020 passed in WP(C) No. 574/2020. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.