Managing Committee Jame Masjid, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Viquarabad
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-20. Managing Committee Jame Masjid, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Viquarabad. Read the...
Judgment text
[ 33021 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 19272 OF 2011 Betweenl 1. Managing Committee Jame Masjid, Ahle Sunnath at Viquarabad Business Represented by its Vice President Mohd Arshad S/o Mohd Sarwar Fl/o H. No. 4-6-25, Emambada, Near Jama Masjid, Viquarabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Mohd Faqruddin, S/o Mohd Gayasuddin Business and member of Committee Fi/o H. No. 4-7-42511, Gangaram, Viquarabad, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Viquarabad, at Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Rural Ranga Reddy District at Viquarabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Viquarabad, Ranga Reddy District. .....
RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the respondents in not disposing the representation of the petitioners dated 04-07-2011 and 05-07 -2O1'l is illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to provide police aid to the petitioners society, Jame-Masjid Ahle Sunnath, at Viquarabad. l. A. NO:1 OF 2011 (WPMP. NO:23275 OF 2011) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to rect the respondents to pass speaking orders on the representations of tte petitioners society dated: O4-O7 -2O11 and 05-05-2011. |. A. NO:2 OF 2011(WPMP.
NO: 25165 OF 2011) // Petition Under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in // the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to take necessary action against the culprits by passing speaking orders on the complaint of the petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI ASADULLA SHAREEF Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following OROER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. L9272 of 2011 ORDER: i / This petition is coming for hearing since 20 1 1. On 3O. 1O. 2O24, when the matter was called, there was no representation, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this CASC. 2.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismisscd for non- prosecution/default. No order as to costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/. L. LAKSHMI BABU ASS T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION To OFFICER REVENUE, Hish court ror the stare or retangana ar ' Iffifr";l:,frio* 2. Two CCs to bp FbR HOME, High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT1 3. One CC to SRt ASADULLA SHAREEF, Advocate tOpUCI ,*o CD Copies aOO. BSR F\- :/ HIGH COURT DATED:2011112024 1 t\ L ST A r4r ORDER t o 28 JAN 20zs 7 WP. No. 19272 of 2011 t D (_ o E P C DISMISSING THE W. P FOR NON. PROSECUTION / DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS. . of4 #-"
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.